Posts
Why thriving and staying are the only hiring metrics that matter
See other posts from by Bryan Adams
CEO
The metrics that look good but tell you little
For years, we have measured hiring success using speed and scale, tracking application volume, conversion rate and time to hire as if those numbers alone could tell us whether our recruitment strategy is working.
They look impressive in a board pack, and they create a comforting illusion of efficiency and momentum. Yet beneath those metrics sits a far more important question that most organizations are not honest enough to ask.
Are the people you hire thriving once they arrive, and are they still there eighteen months later, contributing meaningfully to the organization?
If the answer is no, then everything else you are optimizing is largely irrelevant.
If you are not actively measuring 12–18 month retention, first-year performance rating or early voluntary attrition, then you are not measuring hiring success. You are measuring activity.
Scaling misalignment is still misalignment
You do not want more applicants. You want people who have what it takes to thrive in your conditions and who genuinely want to stay once they have joined.
Until that foundation is solid, accelerating the funnel means you are scaling misalignment.
Most recruitment technology is built to remove friction and increase throughput. Ease became the north star because it was measurable and because it felt like progress.
The problem is that ease does not equal alignment, and speed does not guarantee success.
Why candidates really leave
Candidates rarely leave organizations because the application process was inefficient.
They leave because the lived experience did not match the expectation that attracted them.
When we optimize for volume before we optimize for clarity, we create motion without direction. That may look productive on a dashboard, but it often results in regret, early attrition and reputational damage further down the line.
What is friction by design in hiring?
I have long argued for something I call friction by design.
Not all friction is bad. Some friction is responsible, protective, and deeply respectful.
Friction by design means using your employer brand intelligently to make the real conditions of performance visible before someone applies. It means being explicit about standards, pace, accountability and expectations rather than softening them in the name of attraction.
When done well, this does not exclude unfairly. It gives candidates the information they need to assess themselves with honesty and decide whether this environment is one in which they can succeed.
Every organization has real operating conditions
Every organization operates under a set of real conditions, whether they articulate them or not.
There is a pace at which decisions are made, a tolerance for ambiguity, a level of ownership expected, and a standard that defines excellence.
Some people are energized by high autonomy and constant change. Others perform best in structured environments with clear guardrails. Neither is superior, but they are different.
When we obscure those realities, we create misalignment.
Inclusion requires clarity, not encouragement
True inclusion is not about encouraging everyone to apply to everything.
It is about giving everyone the clarity and agency to decide whether they will thrive here.
Friction by design surfaces those conditions honestly and invites candidates to reflect on whether they want to operate in that context. It replaces vague promises with tangible signals and transforms the application decision into an informed choice rather than an optimistic guess.
Retention starts at the point of application
Retention begins long before onboarding.
Staying is a decision shaped at the point of application.
When someone joins with incomplete information, they are buying into a projection. When they join with clear expectations and a realistic understanding of what will be required, they are making a conscious commitment.
Commitment follows clarity, and clarity builds trust.
The three dimensions of match
If thriving and staying become your north star metrics, the design of your hiring experience changes.
You begin to think in three dimensions of match:
- Match to the work: Helping candidates understand the true skill demands and standards required to excel.
- Match to the conditions: Revealing how the organization operates so they can assess whether that suits them.
- Match to expectations: Being clear about the level of accountability and responsibility that defines success.
This is not about screening harder. It is about helping both sides make better decisions earlier.
The missing alignment layer on most careers sites
The careers website is the only place where brand, expectation and application intersect in real time.
Yet most platforms still treat it as a content repository whose job is to push traffic into an applicant's tracking system.
What is often missing is the alignment layer that helps candidates assess themselves against the work, the conditions and the expectations before they click apply.
Without that layer, you are relying on optimism.
With it, you are building conviction.
When scale makes sense and when it does not
If the answer to thriving and staying is yes, if your hires are flourishing and remaining committed, then by all means optimize for scale.
Increase visibility. Improve conversion. Reduce time to hire.
Growth makes sense when your work grows.
Until then, optimization is premature. Scaling a system that produces misalignment amplifies the problem. It increases cost, churn, and reputational risk.
Speed without clarity is not efficient. It is a waste.
Designing for thriving probability
We now can design candidate experiences that surface skills align earlier, reveal operating conditions more honestly, and clarify expectations before commitment is made.
What is required is not more activity, but more clarity.
A willingness to measure thriving probability and retention intent before celebrating clicks and completions. That means tracking leading indicators such as candidate self-selection rates, expectation of alignment feedback during onboarding, and early attrition within the first 12 months alongside traditional funnel metrics.
Make it easy to decide, not just easy to apply
The organizations that will win in the next era of hiring are not those who make it easiest to apply, but those who make it easiest to decide.
Thriving and staying are the real metrics because they reflect whether your employer brand holds up.
Once those metrics are strong, scale becomes a powerful multiplier. Until then, it is just noise.
Friction by design is not an obstacle to growth.
It is the discipline that ensures growth is worth pursuing.
FAQs
What does “thriving and staying” mean in hiring?
“Thriving and staying” means measuring hiring success by whether new hires perform well in the role and remain with the organization long enough to create meaningful impact, often assessed at 12–18 months.
Why isn’t there time to hire and application volume enough to measure hiring success?
Speed and volume measure activity, not outcomes. If hires leave early or underperform, a faster funnel simply scales misalignment and increases cost, churn, and reputational risk.
What is “friction by design” in the hiring experience?
Friction by design is the deliberate use of clarity, specificity, and real expectations to help candidates self-assess fit before applying. It replaces vague attraction messaging with information that supports better decisions on both sides.
How can we measure whether hires are likely to thrive and stay?
Use outcome metrics such as 12–18 month retention, early voluntary attrition, and first performance review outcomes. Add leading indicators such as onboarding expectation-alignment feedback, hiring manager confidence at 60–90 days, and candidate self-selection rates.
Does friction by design reduce diversity or inclusion?
Not inherently. True inclusion requires clarity and agency, not encouraging everyone to apply to everything. When expectations and operating conditions are transparent, more candidates can make informed choices about whether they will thrive.
What are the “three dimensions of match” and why do they matter?
They are: match to the work (skills and standards), match to conditions (how the organization operates), and match to expectations (accountability and responsibility). Together, they reduce false positives and improve the quality of applicant intent.
Why is the careers site central to alignment?
The careers site is where brand, expectation, and application intersect in real time. Done well, it can provide an “alignment layer” that helps candidates decide with confidence before they click apply.
When should we optimize the funnel for scale?
Scale makes sense once thriving and staying outcomes are strong. If retention and performance signals are weak, optimizing for conversion and speed is premature and amplifies misalignment.
